Why PassVision
Prevention and proof, not policy and guesswork.
Most tools tell you a credential leaked. PassVision prevents the weak one, proves which leaked ones still work, and closes the loop, all on your own infrastructure.
Reasons teams choose PassVision
Coverage nothing else gives you.
One platform that prevents, detects, verifies, and remediates, orchestrating the intel you already have, entirely inside your perimeter.
Inside and outside
Blocks weak passwords in your org and proves which leaked ones still work.
From “leaked” to “live”
Real login verification, not guesswork about what might be exploitable.
Your org first
Findings tied to real users and real apps, tracked over time to resolution.
Always-on
Policy enforcement, automated feeds, and verification with no manual work.
Enterprise-ready
Role-based access, LDAP, encrypted storage, deployable fully on-prem.
Proof, not policy
Continuous enforcement you can evidence: audit trails, not point-in-time claims.
How we're different
Three categories of tool. One platform.
Buyers usually compare PassVision to something they already own. It sits across all three, and does what none of them do alone.
They stop at prevention.
PassVision verifies real-world exploitability and drives every risk to closure: reset, notify, alert, tracked until it's done.
They sell you more data.
PassVision orchestrates the data you already have (HIBP plus your own CTI) into prevention, verification, and action.
They hold your data.
PassVision is self-hosted and air-gap ready; your credential data never leaves your environment.
| Capability | PassVision | Password-policy tools | Breach-data feeds | Cloud / SaaS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block weak & breached passwords in AD | ||||
| Continuously re-check every account | ||||
| Detect your org's leaked credentials | ||||
| Verify which leaked credentials are live | ||||
| Remediate to closure (reset + verify) | ||||
| Orchestrate your own CTI + HIBP | ||||
| Self-hosted / air-gap ready |
The through-line
Prevent. Detect. Verify. Act.
Four moves, one loop, closed continuously so exposure never sits open.
Prevent
The weak password, blocked the instant it's set.
Detect
The leaked one, surfaced across your directory as breach data lands.
Verify
Whether it's live: a real login attempt, under authorization.
Act
Until it's closed: reset, notify, alert, verified done.
One platform, both sides of the door.
Comparison FAQ
Common comparison questions, answered.
Buyers usually compare PassVision to something they already own. Here are the direct answers.
How is PassVision different from Have I Been Pwned or a breached-password checker?
A breached-password checker tells you a password appeared in a leak. PassVision goes further: it prevents breached passwords at the moment of change, ties exposures to real accounts, verifies which leaked credentials still authenticate, and remediates to closure, orchestrating breach data (including HIBP) plus your own CTI.
How is PassVision different from Microsoft Entra Password Protection?
Microsoft Entra Password Protection blocks a limited global banned-password list. PassVision adds continuous re-checking against billions of breach records, structural-weakness detection, granular OU/group/user policy, automated remediation with reset verification, and live credential verification, all self-hosted.
How is PassVision different from SpyCloud or Outpost24?
SpyCloud and Outpost24 are primarily breach-data and dark-web monitoring services. PassVision is an enforcement, verification, and orchestration layer that runs on your own infrastructure, preventing weak passwords in Active Directory and proving which leaked credentials are live, rather than selling you more data.
See the difference on your own directory.
Prevention at the source, proof from the outside. Evaluate both on your environment.